I think I have mis. read the lettin In this print that Hong Kong have in fost
Jet
Within
h.
Х
17
I had just completed the minute Sprite when the propens
which there fut n
fo for
ลา
ห
31
↑
3ட
the Amy Kay whet
might each
his comments
ousemity in
Co
wore brought in time
mo. 31 is concerned by s'gram
copy fit the frenousand art for There
are several point I diffimety It is clear enough that 5.9 (iv) quhe
comper Empray implying the
Ordinance does not
Admiralty.
But Johns when it is not restimated o
United Kingdom based employees.
food timpnay employees
If local personnel
restriction were do
To extend it free
a whole host.
could bring in
wwwle
United Kingdom Good"
introdand
And & wintershane
that restriction might will have reise political diffentties
(vide Mr. Kyle's reference
Mamre in 32).
It corner be interesting thus what action Hung
i
also Colonial
Komy has taken to meet the situation
why, offrarmelly, this action will not meet the case if Choice Allowance is
increased.
suggest we need not hold up the despatch any lagen while we are discussing this case
but we
ith Hik
might perhaps refor in the despatch the s'gram I have supportant dove
the the two
Things together
Will Finance Seft. The p
the general print veived in 51?
זי
2.
bluere 18%,
fo
I wren 17/12
in Mr. Wallace's minute of
In view of 'X' in
17/12 Finance Dept
point.
(31) looks tricky. I
do not wich & fress the
am inclined to
agree
that it would
be but f
ها
rent
copy &
Х
Ј
Mw
sorry
the Greme right away.
ما
me. Wlease?
to have
have delayed
Cd. the Hp. then
اللسعة ...
this owing to presume of work.
ch
new
19/12
I
of Mr Redually munte of 19. have deleted his foot addition to para 3
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.